The housing market is not one market. It is a collection of local markets moving at different speeds, under the same high-cost sky.
Welcome to the August edition of The Full Measure. From an appraiser’s desk, the national economy and the housing market seem to be moving at different speeds. The economy is still expanding, credit conditions do not signal broad stress, and the labor market remains historically tight. At the same time, the home market is constrained by elevated mortgage rates, low turnover, affordability pressures, and increasingly consequential local differences.
That contrast matters. Appraisers do not value a headline. We value the market evidence surrounding a specific property on a specific effective date. August’s data underscores why that distinction is essential.
Economic Growth Continues, But Inflation Remains Sticky
The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that real GDP increased at a 1.5% annual rate in the second quarter, following 2.1% growth in the first quarter. Consumer spending, investment, and exports supported the expansion, while nonresidential structures and government spending were drags. This is not a stalled economy, but it is a more measured one.
For appraisers, a slower-growing economy is not a red flag on its own. It simply means the demand-side support behind current pricing is thinner than it was a year ago, which is one more reason a comparable sale from earlier this year deserves a second look before it anchors an opinion of value.
The central challenge remains inflation. The Federal Reserve’s preferred gauge, the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, was up 3.7% year over year in July; core PCE, excluding food and energy, rose 3.3%, according to the BEA’s latest PCE release. The July employment report adds another complication: payroll employment declined by 23,000, and prior months were revised downward by a combined 103,000 jobs. Still, unemployment held at a low 4.1%. The message is mixed: hiring has softened, but broad job losses have not materialized.
For valuation professionals, inflation is never merely a macroeconomic statistic. It reaches the market through household purchasing power, contractor bids, replacement-cost estimates, and the rate at which buyers can qualify for financing.
Mortgage Rates: The Market’s Gatekeeper
The Federal Reserve held its target rate at 3.50% to 3.75% in July, but three voting members preferred a quarter-point increase. In his August 28 Jackson Hole address, Chairman Kevin Warsh said inflation is the more concerning side of the Fed’s mandate and that the Fed’s predominant focus should be on prices. The clear implication is that near-term rate relief should not be treated as a foregone conclusion.
The 30-year fixed mortgage rate was 6.66% for the week ending August 27, according to Freddie Mac’s Primary Mortgage Market Survey. It is only slightly different from recent readings, but the monthly-payment effect remains substantial. The NAHB/Wells Fargo Cost of Housing Index found that a typical family needed 36% of income to afford an existing home in the second quarter; a lower-income family required 71%.
The lock-in effect compounds the affordability problem. Nearly half of outstanding fixed-rate mortgages carried rates below 4% in the first quarter. Owners with a low-rate loan have a powerful financial reason to stay put, restricting resale supply and turnover. This is not a typical inventory glut. It is a market in which many potential sellers are missing from the transaction stream.
| August 2026 indicator | Latest reading | Appraisal relevance |
| Real GDP growth, Q2 | 1.5% annualized | Supports demand, but at a moderated pace |
| Headline PCE inflation, July | 3.7% year over year | Keeps pressure on rates and construction inputs |
| Unemployment rate, July | 4.1% | Low nationally, but local job trends still matter |
| 30-year fixed mortgage rate | 6.66% | Limits buyer purchasing power and turnover |
| Existing-home supply, July | 4.6 months | Nationally stable, but not a substitute for local supply data |
| New-home supply, July | 9.6 months | Highlights builder competition and incentive risk |
Existing Homes: Stable Nationally, Uneven Locally
July existing-home sales declined 1.7% from June to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.06 million, though they were 0.7% above the prior year. The median sales price was $434,100, up 2.0% year over year, and the supply of unsold homes stood at 4.6 months, as detailed in the National Association of REALTORS® July existing-home sales report. In broad terms, the market remains stable but thin.
The key word is broad. Regional variation was substantial in the same report: the Northeast’s median price increased 5.2% year over year, compared with gains of 0.9% in the South and 0.2% in the West. These are not merely regional anecdotes. They are evidence that national averages cannot do the work of local market analysis.
Listing data add another layer. Realtor.com reported 1.14 million active listings for the week ending August 22, the highest count since December 2019. The median listing price was down 2.1% from a year earlier.
Listings are not closed sales, and their trends should never be used interchangeably with transaction data. Still, the contrast suggests a familiar late-cycle dynamic: sellers are becoming more realistic while completed sales continue to reflect the more constrained stock that actually reached the closing table.
New Construction: Competition Has a Different Price Tag
The new-home sector deserves separate treatment. The Census Bureau and HUD’s July new-home sales release showed sales falling 10.5% to an annual rate of 607,000. New homes for sale rose to 488,000, equivalent to 9.6 months of supply, while the median new-home price fell to $393,800.
That supply measure is not comparable on a one-for-one basis with the 4.6 months reported for existing homes. New-home supply includes properties that are completed, under construction, and not yet started. More important, builders can actively manage demand through price reductions, upgrades, closing-cost assistance, and mortgage-rate buydowns.
In a subdivision where builder product competes with resale homes, appraisers should investigate the effective price of the builder offering, not just the contract price. A seller-funded buydown, for example, may help a buyer qualify but may not have the same market effect as a permanent base-price cut. The terms of the sale are evidence, not fine print.
Builders are also managing a difficult cost environment, and it shows up directly in the cost approach. In July, the Producer Price Index for goods used in home construction rose 6.7% year over year, while smaller builders reported a median material-cost increase of 9.1%, versus 1.8% for larger builders.
This disparity helps explain why a custom or smaller-project segment may behave differently from a large production-builder subdivision in the same market, and it is a reminder that replacement-cost figures pulled from production-builder pricing can understate what a custom build actually costs today.
Nominal Price Growth Is Not the Same as Real Appreciation
The June S&P Cotality Case-Shiller National Home Price Index rose 1.5% year over year, but inflation was 3.5% over the same period. By that measure, home values declined in real terms for the thirteenth consecutive month. That does not mean prices are broadly collapsing. It means modest nominal appreciation is not keeping pace with the overall price level.
The geographic spread is equally important. Chicago recorded a 6.9% annual gain in June, while Seattle, Las Vegas, and Denver posted declines. Appraisers should expect this kind of divergence to continue. Current, proximate, truly comparable sales will capture it. A national narrative will not.
There is no broad distress signal. Mortgage delinquencies eased slightly in the second quarter to 4.37%, and distressed sales represented only 2% of July transactions. Yet the delinquency rate was still 44 basis points higher than a year earlier, foreclosure inventory rose to 0.67%, and seriously delinquent loans increased for a fourth consecutive quarter.
The Mortgage Bankers Association’s Q2 delinquency survey supports watchfulness, particularly in entry-level segments and markets with weakening employment, not a presumption of a 2008-style correction.
In short: this is not a crisis, but it is not nothing, and it is exactly where a diligent appraiser should be looking a little harder before signing off on stable market conditions.
The Appraiser’s August Takeaway
This is a market that rewards disciplined observation. Verify concessions. Differentiate a list-price reduction from a financing concession. Analyze competing new construction when it is relevant. Give days on market, exposure, and listing-to-sale-price behavior their proper weight. When the comparable pool is thin, do not let the need for a number outrun the market evidence.
That is the work of the appraiser as a Macro Stabilizer. We do not make the market, and we should not force a national story onto local evidence. We measure the market as it is: still constrained, increasingly segmented, sensitive to mortgage rates, and unmistakably local.
Stay diligent, stay curious, and keep measuring the market.
The views expressed are those of the author and are intended for educational and informational purposes only.
Keep your license up to date with McKissock’s appraisal continuing education courses!
