The wealth of digital information available today presents both an opportunity and a challenge for professional land surveyors. Tools like historical aerials and Geographic Information System (GIS) layers can paint a vivid picture of a property’s past, offering powerful insights.
However, their accessibility can also lead to misinterpretation if not handled with professional care. The key is understanding their proper place in your workflow: as powerful contextual clues, not as primary boundary evidence.
This post will guide you through a workflow for using these valuable resources to support your research without giving them undue weight. We will explore how to use historical imagery and GIS layers to tell the “site story,” guide field searches, and strengthen your final boundary opinion, all while keeping deeded evidence and field-verified monuments at the core of your determination.
The Role of Historical Aerials and GIS Layers
Before we dive into the workflow, let’s clarify what these tools are and what they offer.
Historical aerial photographs provide a snapshot in time, showing land use, vegetation patterns, and the location of physical features as they existed in the past. They can reveal old fence lines, forgotten roadbeds, or agricultural patterns that have long since vanished from the ground.
GIS layers, on the other hand, are digital datasets that can be overlaid on a map. For surveyors, these often include:
- Tax parcel maps
- Topographic contours
- Zoning districts
- Wetland delineations
- Soil maps
- Utility locations
Together, these resources help build a comprehensive narrative of the subject property. They can show how the land has evolved, highlight potential conflicts, and point you toward areas that require closer investigation. This “site story” is invaluable for understanding the big picture before you ever set foot in the field.
Evidence vs. Context: The Core Principle
The most critical skill in modern boundary research is distinguishing between legal evidence and supporting context. Overlooking this distinction is one of the fastest ways to arrive at a flawed boundary opinion.
Boundary evidence is the foundation of your work. It is legally recognized and forms the basis of property rights. This category includes:
- Deeds and Conveyances: The written instruments transferring title.
- Plats and Maps of Survey: Official recorded documents depicting boundaries.
- Monuments: Physical markers, both natural and artificial, called for in the record.
- Field Correlation: The direct, on-the-ground recovery, measurement, and evaluation of evidence that ties the record to the physical world.
Contextual clues, by contrast, provide background information but do not, by themselves, define a boundary line. Historical aerials, tax maps, and most GIS layers fall squarely into this category.
While some GIS data may originate from authoritative or recorded sources, surveyors must always evaluate the original source, purpose, and legal standing of the data—not merely its digital presentation.
GIS layers can suggest where a boundary might be or explain why a fence exists, but they are not a substitute for the chain of title or a found monument called for in a deed. A tax parcel line in a GIS database is a graphic representation for assessment purposes; it is not a legal boundary line.
Over-weighting contextual information is a significant pitfall. A blurry line on a 1950s aerial photo or a neatly drawn line on a county GIS website can be compelling, but relying on it as primary evidence can lead to serious errors and professional liability.
Note: Boundary law and evidentiary standards vary by state. Surveyors should evaluate these concepts in light of applicable statutes, case law, and professional regulations.
A Practical Workflow for Integrating Digital Data
To use these tools responsibly, integrate them into a structured research process that prioritizes evidence.
Step 1: Start with the Record Evidence
Your investigation should always begin with the foundational documents. Pull the subject and adjoiner deeds, review the controlling plats, and build a clear picture of the record title. This establishes the legal framework and tells you what you should be looking for in the field.
Step 2: Use GIS and Aerials for Context and Reconnaissance
With the deed research complete, now is the time to turn to GIS layers and historical imagery. Overlay the deed calls or plat geometry onto the digital maps in an approximate, reference-only manner and look for discrepancies.
Does the county tax map align with the plat? Does a historical aerial show a fence line where the deed calls for one? Use this step to identify areas of interest, potential encroachments, or physical features that might have evidentiary value.
Step 3: Correlate with Field Evidence
Armed with your record research and digital reconnaissance, head to the field. Your primary objective is to find the monuments and evidence called for in the controlling documents. Use the contextual information to guide your search. If an old aerial shows a tree line that matches a deed call, it can help you focus your search for a monument along that line. If a GIS layer shows a creek in a different location than the plat, you know to investigate that area carefully.
Step 4: Document Your Findings
In your final report or map, clearly document how you used each piece of information. If a historical photo supported your decision to consider a long-standing fence line in the context of doctrines such as acquiescence, practical location, or adverse possession (where recognized by law), explain that reasoning.
If the county’s GIS layers were inconsistent with your final boundary determination, note that discrepancy and explain why your located boundary, based on controlling evidence, is correct.
This transparency protects you and clarifies your professional opinion.
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Even with a solid workflow, it’s easy to fall into common traps.
- The Trap of Precision: A GIS line looks clean and precise on a screen, but its spatial accuracy may be feet—or even yards—from its true location. Never assume digital data has survey-grade accuracy unless you can verify its source, metadata, coordinate system, and stated accuracy.
- The Lure of the “Smoking Gun”: Finding an old fence on an aerial that seems to match a deed description feels like a major breakthrough. However, without corroborating evidence (like testimony, age of the fence, or a found monument), it remains just a clue. Avoid confirmation bias and treat it as one piece of the puzzle.
- Ignoring Data Limitations: The quality and resolution of historical imagery vary greatly. A distorted, low-resolution photo can be easily misinterpreted. Always consider the potential for scale errors, relief displacement, and other photographic distortions.
The solution to these pitfalls is professional skepticism. Question every piece of data. Ask where it came from, how it was created, and what its intended purpose was. Use it to ask better questions, not to jump to conclusions.
Conclusion: Tools, Not Crutches
Historical aerials and GIS layers have fundamentally changed boundary research for the better. They allow us to investigate properties more thoroughly and efficiently than ever before, providing invaluable context that helps us understand the land and make more informed decisions in the field.
However, they are supporting tools. The core of a surveyor’s duty remains unchanged: to follow the footsteps of the original surveyor by recovering the best available evidence as defined by law and precedent. By integrating digital data into a workflow that honors this principle, you can harness its power responsibly.
Use these tools to build a stronger, more defensible boundary opinion, but never let them become a crutch that replaces rigorous research and sound professional judgment.
Rely on McKissock for all your land surveyor continuing education. Check out our courses on Boundary Disputes, Drone Surveying, and many other topics of interest.
